"Consultant
           of
      Choice
 
          for
    improving
         the
  competitive
      market
     position
 
          of
    software
organizations."

 

Site Map for software process improvement, SQA, ISO 9000-3, SEI CMM, ISO 15504 (SPICE),...Site Map

Consulting for software process improvement, SQA, ISO 9000-3, SEI CMM, ISO 15504 (SPICE),...Consulting

Training for software process improvement, SQA, ISO 9000-3, SEI CMM, ISO 15504 (SPICE),...Training

Facilitation servicesFacilitation

Hotlist for software process improvement, SQA, ISO 9000-3, SEI CMM, ISO 15504 (SPICE),...Hotlist

Articles for software process improvement, SQA, ISO 9000-3, SEI CMM, ISO 15504 (SPICE),...Articles

Job Aids for software process improvement, SQA, ISO 9000-3, SEI CMM, ISO 15504 (SPICE),...Job Aids

Bulletin Board for software process improvement, SQA, ISO 9000-3, SEI CMM, ISO 15504 (SPICE),...Bulletin
      Board

Specialty store for software process improvement, SQA, ISO 9000-3, SEI CMM, ISO 15504 (SPICE),...Specialty
      Store

Company profile, mission, owner profile,...Profile

Creating alliances with TantaraAlliances

Go to Tantara's home pageHome

Contact Tantara (general inquiries)Contact
      Tantara

Sign guestbookGuestbook

To report problems regarding this web pageWebmaster

Page banner


ISO 15504 (SPICE)

-- Why another standard/model?

"Destiny is not a matter of chance, it is a matter of choice: 
it is not a thing to be waited for, 
it is a thing to be achieved." 
-- William Jennings Bryan 
The ISO 15504 (SPICE) model is still considered in its infancy--the ISO 15504 model was released as a technical report in 1998--it is not yet released as an official standard.

Many people are asking questions--the key question being "why another standard/model?"

One of the primary benefits that ISO 15504 provides is the ability to compare apples against apples.  As a customer, you will be able to judge "an organization assessed under the SEI SW-CMM model against an organization assessed under, say, the Trillium or Bootstrap model".  In view of the software vendor, you need not change your software process improvement model of choice (e.g., SEI SW-CMM, Trillium, Bootstrap,...) nor do you need to re-educate your Software Engineering Process Group on any new assessment framework.

Sound too good to be true?  Well, this is how ISO 15504 permits this to occur:
 
Bullet ! ISO 15504 has 2 standards:
-- ISO 15504-2 is a common base for different software process improvement models
-- ISO 15504-3 is the minimum requirements for performing assessments
Bullet ! Existing software process improvement models (like SEI SW-CMM, Trillium,...) need only be cross-referenced with ISO 15504-2 -- note: SEI has already released a high-level cross-reference
Bullet ! Existing assessment frameworks (like SEI CBA-IPI, SEI SCE, or a consultant's own assessment framework) need only be cross-referenced with ISO 15504-3.  Note, the FAA has already cross-referenced their FAA-iCMM® Appraisal Method.
Bullet ! Having cross-referenced your assessment framework and software process improvement model of choice, comparing apples against apples is then possible!

Now, that is worth another standard/model.  Do you not agree?



For additional information, refer to Tantara's ISO 15504 (SPICE) Hotlist.
 
Article written by Marielle Chevrier, a Certified Provisional SPICE Assessor 
and owner of Tantara Inc.  Tantara is a business consulting firm
specialized in software best practices and the improvement of
process effectiveness and software product/service potential.

Go to the top of this pagetop of pageGo to Tantara's home pagehome page

[ hotlist ]   [ training ]  [ facilitation ]   [ consulting ]   [ profile ]   [ bulletin ]   [ store ]   [ contact ]

( Authored: May 21, 2001 )